The Warren Centre proposes the development of a national agriculture technology strategy (Digital Innovation for Farms), and we make recommendations for the major elements of such a strategy.
This strategy was originally outlined in response to the questions identified in the Australian Government’s Agricultural Competitiveness White Paper which relate to agricultural technology, innovation, export opportunities for technology, research and development and new tools.
The key aspects of this strategy are outlined below:
Download our formal government submission here (PDF, 233KB)
Digital technologies offer great promise to the agri-foods sector. Big data, advanced algorithms, robotics, and genomics are some of the innovations which can usher in a different kind of agriculture.
Australian agriculture and its downstream customers need to be re-positioned to take advantage of new developments in digital technologies that will improve productivity and value-add across all agri-supply chain operations.
Intelligent farm machines, ultra-cheap computing, more powerful algorithms, and Big Data have the potential to increase farm returns in the midst of tough global competition.
Australian agriculture must advance as an information economy, if it is to be globally competitive.
Technologies that have developed dramatically in recent years in other fields and industries that could easily be applied in an integrated fashion in the next wave of agricultural productivity growth include:
This digital agriculture will enable farmers to monitor each individual plant or animal on the farm, know its full life history, and manage production and harvesting using that knowledge. It will deliver a more flexible and ever-more precise agriculture.
Picture for a moment Australia’s farmers in a decade from now. They are managing larger, leaner, more productive agri-food operations through more technologically advanced operations. Leading farmers will be making more money and using less inputs. For example:
Many components of tomorrow’s intelligent machines and IT data systems exist today but are currently either not integrated into coherent systems or are underutilised in Australia.
Australia risks being known only for commodity agriculture, in a world that is seeking premium products with defined quality standards, produced using sustainable methods. Moreover, there is mounting evidence that productivity growth from existing agri-technology paradigms may have run its course.
Australia’s economy can benefit from a growing agri-technology industry. The increasing complexity of digital agriculture offers a large number of entry points for Australian companies and start-ups to innovate in digital agriculture, both for local and export markets. There will be a new generation of agricultural service companies that design, build and maintain intelligent farm equipment.
Farm enterprises have the potential to produce terabytes of image and operational data each day. An increasingly valuable output of agri-enterprises will be the transformed raw data and meta-data arising from information rich agricultural practices that will add more value to the farm’s products (data sold with the product) and drive significant operational efficiency gains (data used on the farm to produce those products).
Note however that these opportunities could be squandered through inappropriate proprietary system/technology lock-out.
The massive quantity of raw data generated across the entire agri-food supply chain presents a significant systems integration task. These opportunities for better farm produce and higher productivity will be adversely impacted if the devices and systems for digital farming are developed on closed protocols that prevent widespread communication between devices and systems. The sector needs a ‘Decision Support Technology Platform’ based on a set of open technical protocols or standards.
Companies overseas and in other industries are working on this problem. GE has a platform called Predix for industrial internet sensors in products like gas turbines. Boeing Co. has an avionics “sensor fusion” platform for its military fighters. But these are proprietary standards.
Monsanto is leading in the race to develop an integrated proprietary platform for crop farming, complete with its own monitoring satellite, together with soil, weather, crop seed data. For the farmer, the outputs of Monsanto’s platform are field scripts for ‘recipe-based’ farming, tailored for each plot of land.
Moreover, overseas decision support platforms are geared to a farm environment specialising in either crops or livestock, but not a mixed farm environment which is typical of Australia.
Technology platforms are expensive to build: there are large fixed costs in R&D, software development and the construction of specialised supporting systems. This leads to economies of scale over a wide range of transaction volumes.
Given the heterogeneity of Australian agriculture The Warren Centre is of the view that an open technology standard needs to be promoted for Australian agriculture. Australian agriculture faces unique challenges that will not be solved in North America or Europe.
The ultimate objective for Digital Innovation is to change the way food and fibre is produced. This is of enormous importance to productivity growth in agriculture. It also opens up a new way of organising farming enterprises to help deal with the ageing workforce in agriculture.
The Warren Centre recommends that a set of complementary initiatives – collectively termed Digital Innovation for Farms – needs to be implemented if Australia is to properly exploit the benefits of digital agriculture. These initiatives include:
Australia needs to expand and promote the cluster of Australian industry and enterprises involved in agricultural technology. With the emergence of new technologies of relevance in the agricultural space, there will be (and could be additional) new industry participants and expanded opportunities for revenue growth from innovative Ag-Tech products and services, configured as smart farming solutions.
An effective, coherent and well-functioning Australian Ag-Tech industry will not only underpin productivity growth in Australian agriculture but is capable of generating growing export income from technology products and services. Those opportunities mirror Australia’s highly successful mining equipment technology and services industry cluster, whose members generate $50bn revenue including $15bn exports annually. A similar vision should exist for agricultural technology.
This must be a national priority, involving participants from R&D, finance and investment sources, commercialisation specialists, as well as farming groups and State and Federal Governments. The Warren Centre believes that an Australian Ag-Tech products and services sector has the potential to deliver a multi-billion dollar addition to the Australian economy and export income.
Specific implementation mechanisms to encourage Australia’s farming sector to roll-out digital farming technologies and drive the associated productivity growth include: